Modernisation starts with an honest audit.

Enterprise architecture reviews, repository audits, and migration frameworks for teams modernising a legacy ecommerce platform without stopping the business.

Legacy monolithsingle deploy unitService boundariesdefined by auditModular servicesindependently shipped

The audit methodology

Inventory

Catalogue every service, dependency, and data contract in the repository as it actually exists today.

Assess

Score each area against a standards rubric: coupling, test coverage, ownership clarity, and integration risk.

Prioritise

Rank findings by blast radius and effort, so the roadmap starts with the highest-leverage fix.

Migrate

Execute the plan in reversible, independently-shippable increments -- never a single big-bang rewrite.

Architecture repository review

What the review actually surfaces

A repository review isn't a lint pass. It maps real ownership boundaries, flags duplicated capability across services, and scores integration risk before a single migration ticket is written.

Repositorysource of truthAudit enginestandards rubricFindingsdebt + risk mapRoadmapsequenced fixes

A migration, start to finish

A retail platform's checkout service was the single highest-risk node in its dependency graph: three teams shipped through it, none of them owned it. The audit isolated the checkout logic into its own service boundary first, before any other extraction, cutting the blast radius of every subsequent release.

Have a repository worth auditing?

Bring the codebase -- the standards rubric does the rest.